Sentyra's agents collect live evidence from your stack, independently verify it, sign every artifact with your org's key, and publish proof your auditors can check themselves.
Agents pull live configuration from AWS, GitHub and your identity provider; your team uploads the governance documents. Every record is SHA-256 hashed the moment it lands, with who collected it and when.
Record shape as stored; values illustrative.
The Evidence Judge reads each artefact against the control's requirements and answers sufficient, partial or insufficient, listing the gaps and anything stale. Its verdict never moves readiness on its own.
Record shape as stored; values illustrative.
Only a reviewer who did not upload the artefact can approve it, with a written rationale and an expiry date. The record carries an Ed25519 signature made with the organisation's key; change one byte and verification fails.
Record shape as stored; values illustrative.
Every action is appended to a hash-chained audit log. The public trust page says verified_partial until a human has attested, and never rounds up. Anyone with your public key can check a signature without asking us.
Record shape as stored; values illustrative.
This is the exact scheme Sentyra applies to every piece of evidence: SHA-256 for integrity, Ed25519 for authenticity. Type anything. Then try to tamper with it.
generating keypair…
Ephemeral public key for this visit: … — in production, every Sentyra org holds its own signing key and auditors verify evidence independently using the org's published public key. Nothing you type here leaves your device.
Every evidence record carries a SHA-256 hash and an Ed25519 signature made with the organisation's own key. Auditors verify it with the published public key; they do not have to trust us.
The agent that collects is never the agent that verifies, and the person who uploads can never approve their own artefact. Readiness moves only on a second person's attestation with a written rationale.
Each action lands in a hash-chained audit log: every entry carries the hash of the one before it, so a removed or altered entry breaks the chain visibly.
The Evidence Judge reads what you upload and says sufficient, partial or insufficient, with the gaps it found. Its verdict is advice; a human decides, and both are recorded.
DPDP Act 2023 and Rules 2025 as the wedge, with SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA on the same evidence base. The only deadlines we quote are the ones the law sets.
Your public Trust Center shows verified, partially verified or self-declared, computed from the recorded evidence. It never rounds up.
Agents pull live configuration from your stack — GitHub branch protection, AWS security posture, Okta MFA policy — as raw, timestamped artifacts. No screenshots, no questionnaires-as-evidence.
A second, independent agent re-fetches the source and cross-checks the collector's claim. Collector and verifier are never the same entity — the separation is architectural, not policy.
Every artifact and verdict is SHA-256 hashed and Ed25519-signed with your org's key, then appended to a tamper-evident decision log. Change one byte and verification fails — you saw it yourself above.
Your Trust Center publishes readiness backed by verifiable evidence. Auditors verify signatures independently with your public key — they don't have to take our word, or yours.
Collectors gather. An independent verifier cross-checks the raw source. The judge cites the exact statute it applied. The verdict is signed and appended to a tamper-evident log. No black boxes, no “trust us” — the trace is the audit.
Illustrative values — the trace format, control ID, and citation are the real product output.
Six frameworks on one evidence base · nine live evidence sources
Each integration is a live evidence source with its own automated checks, not a logo on a wall.
210+ mapped controls across 5 frameworks live today — each control cites its equivalent in other frameworks, so you can see the overlap as you go.
India-first (DPDP Act), expanding to more industry- and domain-specific frameworks over time.
Pricing is tailored to your frameworks, integrations, and team size. Reach out and we’ll work it out together.
Contact sales@sentyra.xyzSpecialist security services
Sentyra's platform brings your compliance work and evidence together. Alongside it, engage our team to scope security assessments, adversary simulations and defensive agent pilots around your environment.
Services are scoped and quoted separately. Delivery expertise, access, methods and availability are confirmed during discovery.
Start a VAPT intakeVulnerability assessment and penetration testing for applications, APIs, cloud environments and networks. Agree the assets and depth of testing around your business risk.
Engagement focus
Prioritized findings, remediation guidance and an agreed retest scope.
Authorized adversary simulations and controlled exploitation to assess attack paths, detection and response. Objectives, permitted techniques and stop conditions are agreed before testing.
Engagement focus
Attack-path evidence, detection gaps and a remediation debrief with your team.
Design and pilot coordinated defensive agents for telemetry review, alert triage and investigation support. Analysts review findings and approve response actions.
Engagement focus
A scoped pilot, evaluation criteria and a human-supervised operating model.
Scoping conversations for banks and financial institutions, power plants and utilities, and nuclear facilities.
We begin with your security and operations teams to establish system boundaries, operational constraints and specialist requirements. For operational technology, the proposed approach prioritizes passive review, tabletop exercises and isolated test environments. Any active testing requires explicit operator authorization and agreed safeguards. Defensive agents support analysts; they do not autonomously control plant or safety systems.
Arrange a scoping conversationYes. Contact sales@sentyra.xyz to discuss VAPT, authorized red teaming and exploitation testing, or a defensive agent swarm pilot. These are separately scoped engagements, rather than features included in a platform subscription. We agree objectives, delivery expertise, access, methods and fees before work starts.
For banks, power plants, utilities and nuclear facilities, discovery starts with the asset owner and security and operations teams. We confirm specialist requirements and permitted environments before agreeing delivery. Operational technology work prioritizes passive review, tabletop exercises and isolated testing; any active testing requires explicit authorization. Defensive agents support human analysts and do not autonomously operate plant or safety systems.
Sentyra uses AI agents for continuous evidence collection rather than periodic snapshots. Every piece of evidence is Ed25519-signed and SHA-256 hashed, creating a verifiable chain of custody. Sentyra supports 6 frameworks natively today — DPDPA, SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR, HIPAA, and PCI DSS — with control mappings between them, and more industry- and region-specific frameworks are on the roadmap.
For cloud infrastructure, Sentyra connects via read-only API integrations — no agents or sidecars to install. Current integrations are AWS, GitHub, Okta, Google Workspace, Slack, Jira, Azure AD, Datadog, and Cloudflare, with more (GCP, GitLab, SIEM platforms, and beyond) planned on the way to 60+. For on-prem-only environments, evidence is collected via manual upload and reviewed by our Evidence Judge, the same as any control without a live API to check.
You scope your program (which data and controls apply to you), connect the integrations you have, and Sentyra starts mapping controls and requesting evidence from there. We don't have enough real customers yet to honestly quote a typical time-to-value number — we'd rather say that than make one up.
Every evidence artifact is SHA-256 hashed and Ed25519-signed, and decision traces are hash-chained so tampering is detectable. Auditors can verify signatures independently using Sentyra's published public key, without needing to trust Sentyra's own systems.
Yes — Sentyra's framework definitions carry cross-references between equivalent controls (e.g. a DPDPA control citing its GDPR or ISO 27701 counterpart), so evidence and readiness for a control can inform its mapped counterparts in other frameworks you're running.
Sentyra is an early-stage platform — email help@sentyra.xyz and you'll hear back from the team directly, not a ticket queue. For pricing and plan questions, reach out to sales@sentyra.xyz.
DPDPA-first, built for India's compliance wave — with SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR and HIPAA on the same evidence base.